" /> Non Fluffy Wicca: April 2005 Archives

« March 2005 | Main | May 2005 »

April 28, 2005

Fla. Agency Gets Teen's Abortion Blocked

Aren't you so glad, that while sexual predators are raping and killing so many young girls in Florida, that instead of doing something about THAT, the Florida Social Services Agency is instead meddling in the rights and with the health of a 13 year old girl whose pregnancy would definitely be far more detrimental to her health than a safe and legal abortion.

It doesn't even matter that PARENTAL CONSENT IS NOT REQUIRED in Florida. So if this child was NOT in a state shelter, she could just go and have her abortion. But because she's disadvantaged, stuck in this state home, somehow these "we know better than YOU idiots have decided to put her health at risk. They charge that she's too immature to make that decision. Hello? She's too immature to decide whether she wants a baby, therefore she must have one? Who gets to take care of this baby that this immature girl who can't make her own decisions is suddenly mature enough to be a mother? Or is she just the incubator for someone's adoption?

Few things annoy me more than government meddling where they should not. But then, Florida wasn't happy enough dragging out the agony of everyone involved with Terry Schiavo, so why should anyone be surprised at this one?

Fla. Agency Gets Teen's Abortion Blocked: "WEST PALM BEACH, Fla.-The state's social services agency was granted a court order to block an abortion for a pregnant 13-year-old girl living in a state shelter, prompting an emergency appeal Wednesday by the American Civil Liberties Union."

(Via FindLaw: Top Legal Headlines.)

April 27, 2005

Why "Wicca For the Masses" Just Doesn't Work

When I first heard the idea of "Wicca for the masses" I thought, "gee, what a great idea! We can get our religion out to as many people as possible, and maybe they just might understand us, and accept us for who we are and what we teach." I thought that it would be a great thing, teaching everyone about the Rede, and self-responsibility, and how we are all part of a cosmic whole. These are definitely things "the masses" need to know. I had visions of a utopian world full of happy Wiccans, thinking of others, minding their own affairs with due care, and living in a better world. But you know what? That ain't happening. The masses aren't ready.

I've been doing a lot of work with an organization that set up a system of teaching Wicca to all comers. Through this group, I've have the wonderful opportunity of seeing the upside, and the downside of this type of an approach. After a number of years, I had become very disillusioned, and decided that perhaps I should analyze my experiences, and try to figure out what was useful and what was not, in hopes of making things better, as well as for my own personal understanding and growth.

I think that the most telling aspect of why "Wicca for the masses" doesn't work lies within Wicca itself; namely the Ethic of Self Responsibility. "The masses" do not hold with that simple ethic. "The masses" want to blame someone else for most things that go wrong in their lives, rather than look within. I've found that attitude VERY prevalent not only in society, but on many of the Wiccan groups I have seen. They run low on money, they ask for people to "send energy" or to "send prayers." They become ill, and they ask for people to "send energy." They lose a job, they want "energy." Now, while I see nothing wrong with asking for a bit of help now and again, that should NOT be the first place to turn. The person low on money should budget, sell belongings, look for a better job, etc. FIRST. The person who is ill should see a doctor or alternative practitioner FIRST. The one without a job should seek one FIRST. And in each case, they should look within and see what THEY can do to prevent a similar event from happening in future. Until one is ready to embrace their own responsibilities and make their own world better, they are not ready for Wicca.

The Wiccan Rede itself calls for a large amount of responsibility. It calls upon us to determine whether or not an action causes harm to others, and if so, it must be carefully considered before that action is undertaken. What is prohibited is not written in a book. It is not mandated by a priest or a pope, it is a decision that must be made by the individual based upon their internal sense of right and wrong. This balancing act takes intelligence, a sense of responsibility, and an internal ethical system. All of those things must be inherent within the person in order for it to work. Taking all comers into Wicca necessarily means that those without those three necessary attributes to balance harm, will enter your group. It will then be your obligation to police them.

Another reason why "the masses" and "Wicca" have difficulties meshing is that practicing Wicca is complicated. One does not walk into a building at a specified time on a specified day, read a passage from a specified book, give the specified answers, kneel and sit when others do, and become a passive audience. Wicca is far from passive. Most people involved in ritual are required to participate in one way or another. One must prepare for that participation by study and practice. Ritual is a group effort in which all pieces must mesh to be effective.

Frankly, Wicca is not for everyone. When you set up a Tradition for everyone, then "everyone" is who you will attract. You will attract those with intelligence who are thirsty for knowledge, and you will attract those who wish to be spoon fed and accept a passive role. You will get those who desire to learn Wicca because they have done some searching and decided it would be a good fit for them, and you will get those who are using Wicca for the reaction they'll get from others when they dramatically claim to be a Witch.

Bringing in "the masses" also breeds the unhealthy "I want power" dynamic. If you accept everyone, you don't have the opportunity to ask not only "Why Wicca" but "Why THIS Tradition of Wicca?" I find it problematic if someone tells me that they are interested in Wicca because it is NOT something else, or they have chosen this Tradition because it is NOT that "other tradition." Oftentimes, they haven't thought through their choices, and when they do, and decide you're not what they really wanted, oftentimes, there is a misplaced feeling of animosity towards the Trad, and subsequent badmouthing of it in public regardless of what you did right or wrong.

Another pitfall with not being able to ask a person's motivation for joining occurs when the potential recruit is credential collecting. Sometimes, all they want is that "Priest/ess" title to amaze friends and family, to make money as a wedding officiant, or to offend the family. That type of person sometimes manifests as an antagonistic selfish person, complaining about any amount of actual work or study that must be done, bitterly opposing any deadlines that might be placed, and vehemently decrying any increase in standards for granting clergy status.

Of course, this opinion is often criticized by those who say that Wicca should be open to everyone, and that I and those who agree with me are just elitist, but to this I have to ask where we are going to get the resources to teach everyone who might take a passing fancy to learning Wicca? How many teachers will burn out at the "nth" iteration of "why do I have to do THIS exercise?" And how many teachers will then be unavailable to the true seeker? How many of those will be replaced by the $19.95, "I wrote a computer program to teach Wicca" that make us all look like charlatans and ignorant kooks?

Yes, it's elitist to only want those who truly have both the desire and the capacity to learn a complicated subject and take their learning into the world, continuing to learn throughout their lifetime. And yes, it may be selfish of me to not wish to pound my head against the wall with people who want a quick fix, or an "insta witch" title. But it's also necessary. If we want to maintain Wicca as the religion that it is, and not morph it into a watered down mainstream version of Christianity (just replace Jesus and Mary with God and Goddess) it is necessary to do OUR homework as well, and only accept those of whom we would be proud to say "that was MY student."

How Badly Do We Shoot Ourselves In the Foot?

With some of the recent stories that have been circulating regarding people claiming discrimination on the basis of religion, I feel it's time to say something. Frankly, I'm pretty damn annoyed with those who use Wicca and other Pagan religions to cry scapegoat and victim. Just two recent examples come to mind that illustrate my annoyance. One is the 14 year old boy who claimed he was being discriminated against as a Wiccan because the school wouldn't let him wear massive amounts of make up. The other is the child molester in Australia who claims that he's being persecuted because he's Wiccan.

Please, folks.... let's stop this crying wolf routine before it turns otherwise sympathetic citizens against us? Those who are facing TRUE discrimination are being ignored because these crazies are grabbing center stage, causing a knee jerk reaction from others. Can't wear make up to school? What RELIGIOUS reason would you possibly have for claiming that's necessary? Someone else wanted me to write an opinion letter that her body piercings were religious and therefore must be allowed in her workplace. Really? What covenant of Wiccan faith mandates body piercings? And I won't even bother to comment on the child molester.

While this kind of nonsense grabs headlines, who is going to listen to the REAL battles? How about the Wiccan who was prohibited from a flea market because she was a Witch? (Not because she was selling Witch stuff, mind you, but because of her personal religious practice. Read more here ) What about the people who want to worship in their home with a few members of their coven? ( More on that here). And what about the friend who asked to remain anonymous who was told by his township that they are no longer allowed "those Satanic services" on his own property or "they'll be forced to move?"

So next time you want to claim it's your religion that is getting you unwanted attention and discrimination, take a close look. Is it REALLY your religion? Or is it, as happened to one person, refusal to dress appropriately for her job? Or maybe refusal to cease from prostheletyzing? (I'd fire ANYONE who incessantly annoyed others in the workplace, regardless of which religion was being "pushed.") Or perhaps, as happened to yet another acquaintance, failure to bathe on a regular basis? Imagine what would happen if people believed that all Wiccans were required by their religion to wear too much make-up, have visible body piercings, not do their jobs, dress like slobs, molest children and smell bad? Gee, that's really going to boost our public relations ratings.

Fight discrimination in any way that you can, but please be sure it's REAL before marching off with your picket signs. We'd all really appreciate it.

April 26, 2005

An explanation for Microsoft's anti-gay stance?

An explanation for Microsoft's anti-gay stance?: "

United States: John Aravosis has been poking around and has discovered that Microsoft pay a $20,000 a month retainer to fundie leader Ralph Reed. The precise reason why isn't known, but Aravosis suspects it might explain something:

Now, just think a minute. Microsoft finds itself under criticism from the local evangelical leader, religious right shareholders, bigoted employees and who knows who else. They don't know what to do. Who do they turn to? Well, if I'm in a religious right pickle, I'd turn to my $20,000 a month retainered religious right consultant, the former leader of the religious right, Ralph Reed.

And which side do we think the former head of the religious right would favor were he advising Microsoft what do when trapped between the Scylla and Charybdis of the gays vs. the religious right?

A. Stick to your guns and defend the gays? or
B. Find a way to stiff the gays and move more in line with the religious right?

Well, shiver my timbers, Microsoft ended up going with option B.

The article includes his sources, copies of invoices etc. Equal Rights Washington has issued an open letter to Microsoft urging to break off the relationship.

Isn't this cute?

Microsoft paying Religious Right leader Ralph Reed $20,000 a month retainer - AMERICAblog, 26th April 2005 (via The Sideshow).

While we're bashing Microsoft, here are the latest super-accurate terms used to find the Prattle home page on the MSN search engine.

"

(Via The Pagan Prattle Online.)

April 22, 2005

So Inclusiveness Necessitates an Apology?

So...by attempting to be inclusive, this school counselor "screwed up" when everyone started screaming. Now WHY would anyone complain when someone attempts to be inclusive? I am confused.

WHEAT RIDGE, Colo. - A school counselor leading the Pledge of Allegiance over the public address system substituted "one nation under your belief system" for "one nation under God." The school apologized for the impromptu switch after students and parents complained.

Everitt Middle School counselor Margo Lucero said her change of words was "a spur-of-the-moment choice" meant to be more inclusive on the sixth anniversary of the Columbine High School shootings on Wednesday.

more here

April 15, 2005

Federal Judge's Correct Ruling

It's about time that someone nailed the FDA on this stupid ban. Americans should be encouraged to do their own research on substances, and only then deciding whether those substances would be right for them. If the FDA can't protect say, someone like me who is allergic to sulfites from companies that ADD sulfites to their water, then fail to warn on a label, why do they think they should be interfering with herbal supplements that have clear warnings on them?

This decision blocks further encroachment into non medical, non food areas by the FDA in its attempts to keep the field clear for conventional medical practitioners and exclude all others, regardless of how many thousands of years they have been used, helping how many millions of individuals. None of that matters when a few people MISUSE the products and get hurt. The rest of us are supposed to suffer.

Kudos to this judge for saying "no" to that nonsense.

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah (AP) -- A federal judge has struck down the FDA ban on supplements containing ephedra, a weight-loss aid linked to dozens of deaths, but it's too early to tell whether the product will be back in stores anytime soon.

The judge Thursday ruled in favor of a Utah supplement company that challenged the Food and Drug Administration's year-old ban. Nutraceutical claimed that ephedra has been safely consumed for hundreds of years.

More from CNN

4th Circuit's Incorrect Ruling

I'm a lawyer. I thought I understood most of the methods by which judicial panels can twist and turn their way into making an improper decision, but this one just takes the cake. It is difficult to fathom, under any stretch of the imagination (judicial or otherwise) that picking and choosing which religions are "proper" and which are not, does NOT violate the establishment clause. If we have any other Pagan attorneys out there, please let me know where I'm wrong, because I fail to see it.

Without going into the unfortunate and incorrect statement Cynthia Simpson made about the "interchangeability of Wicca and witchcraft" I utterly fail to see how, under ANY circumstances, a religious practice can be "rejected" by a governmental body and it NOT being discrimination against minority religions.

I got so annoyed with this short sighted ruling that I wrote the following to the Virginia ACLU:

I am an ordained Wiccan Priestess, certified by Fairfax County to do weddings. I hold a Doctor of Divinity degree, certification in two Wiccan traditions (one of which boasts 140,000 adherents), am the author of a Pagan children's book, and have practiced this particular religious path since 1977. I am also a current member of the Virginia Bar. If I can be of any assistance in preparing any type of appeal to the short sighted ruling by the 4th Circuit, please call on me.

It is unfortunate that Cynthia Simpson stated that Wicca and witchcraft were interchangeable. They are two different (but sometimes overlapping) things. Wicca is religion, and "witchcraft" is one possible means of expressing that religious preference, but is by no means limited to Wicca. Many have likely heard of "Christian Witches." They are not Wiccans yet use witchcraft. This distinction is important in not only dispelling knee-jerk misconceptions some may have of certain practices as being "anti Christian" but also to define the actual religious belief known as Wicca.

I am having extreme difficulty in understanding the 4th Circuit's reasoning that a governmental body picking and choosing religious practices is not establishment. The obvious choices of book based religious practices (Moslem, Jewish, Christian, etc.) vs. others is a clear endorsement of one class of religious practice over another.

Your work with this case has received great attention in the Pagan and Wiccan communities. I am hopeful that many qualified individuals such as myself come forward to offer assistance. Please feel free to call upon me for clarification of religious doctrine, to assist with briefs, or whatever else may be of interest to you. I am also in contact with other Pagan and/or Wiccan attorneys who I am certain would be happy to assist.

Today's story from the Washington Post follows. A federal appeals court yesterday upheld the way Chesterfield County conducts the invocation at its Board of Supervisors meetings, dismissing a lawsuit filed by a local Wiccan priestess who said she was excluded from leading the brief prayer. County officials had told Cynthia Simpson that she could not be on the list of religious leaders allowed to deliver the invocation because it was limited to members of "Judeo-Christian" religions. Backed by civil liberties groups, she filed a federal lawsuit in 2002 alleging that the policy amounted to religious discrimination. Simpson has said that Wicca -- interchangeable, she said, with witchcraft -- is a peaceful religion that focuses on reverence and respect for the cycles of nature. She said she wanted to offer the prayer to help dispel images of wicked witches on broomsticks. A federal judge in Richmond backed Simpson, ruling in 2003 that the Chesterfield board was discriminating against minority religions and violating the constitutional mandate for separation of church and state. The judge ordered the county to change the policy to include all faiths or to stop using it altogether. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit reversed that decision yesterday, ruling that Chesterfield's policy complies with Supreme Court requirements for legislative prayer because it does not advance or disparage any particular religious faith. The decision by a three-judge panel, written by Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, says Chesterfield, a suburban county south of Richmond, has allowed a diverse group of religious leaders to conduct the prayer, including a Muslim imam who was involved in giving an invocation at a board meeting shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Civil liberties groups criticized the decision. "This is a deeply disturbing ruling," said Kent Willis, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, one of two groups that brought the lawsuit. "The Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors, a governmental entity, is endorsing the Judeo-Christian religious tradition while discriminating against all other religions. This kind of government preference for some religions over others is exactly what our Founding Fathers sought to avoid when they gave us [the] First Amendment," Willis said. But County Attorney Steven L. Micas said in a statement that he is gratified by the decision. "Chesterfield County's invocation policy was developed shortly after the Supreme Court of the United States established the constitutional ground rules for legislative invocations. Our policy exceeds the inclusiveness standards set by the court," he said.

April 14, 2005

High Court Asked to End Religious Teatime

Yet another example of "freedom of MY religion and curtailment of YOURS by the Bush Administration. I haven't seen any instances of wild rabid ceremonial tea drinkers accosting school children or old women or scores of drug crazed ceremonial tea drinkers lining up at the Chapel O Love for quickie marriages. Doesn't the Bush Administration have BETTER things to do with its time? Like maybe addressing identity theft or ensuring privacy or free speech? *sigh*

High Court Asked to End Religious Teatime: "A small Christian group's drinking of ceremonial tea could be curtailed if the Bush administration has its way before the Supreme Court. The administration is challenging the New Mexico group and its practice of drinking hoasca, a sacred herbal tea that members believe connects them to God. The tea contains dimethyltryptamine, a controlled substance the administration claims is banned by international treaty. The Court will decide whether to hear the case at its conference Friday."

(Via Law.com.)

April 12, 2005

What Would Jesus Dolls Say?

Guess what I want for Yule?

What Would Jesus Dolls Say?: "A talking Jesus doll is due in stores in May, along with versions of Moses and the Virgin Mary, according to a published report Tuesday."

(Via CNN.com.)

April 10, 2005

If You Go Down To The Woods Today, You're Sure Of A Big Surprise

This is indeed the unfortunate truth. And it makes me so terribly sad. I live on a beautiful road in Virginia. A national historic road. Yet, the McMansions are going up, the trees are coming down, and it looks horrible. A neighbor clear cut 5 acres around his house so that he can "have a yard" (despite the prohibition against cutting trees in the homeowners association bylaws). If you want to live on a clear cut lot, BUY ONE. Don't spend the extra premium to live in a wooden neighborhood, then clear cut the damn trees. Another neighbor put up a butt ugly deer fence. If you don't want wildlife around, WHY LIVE IN THE WOODS?

I recently visited my hometown. The old homestead was surrounded by houses. Since then I've had bad dreams about being surrounded by houses with the yard getting smaller and smaller. The memories I had of studying history in a tree overlooking blueberry bushes were blasted asunder. The wild grapes we used to pick when we were playing hide and seek are gone. They are replaced with duplexes and junky looking condos. The yard next door where we used to swing for hours in one of those big ole New England lawn swings has been populated with not one, but THREE houses. It's enough to make you cry.

If You Go Down To The Woods Today, You're Sure Of A Big Surprise: "Society's current mindset ignores the positive attributes and influences of nature and the environment. They build in the countryside, chop down our trees, kill our wildlife and sell off playing fields in schools. What does this preach to the youth of today? For example, when was the last time you saw a group of kids get excited about going to the countryside or going for a walk with the dog? And if you have, you must admit, it’s rare. This has contributed to kids being more prone to obesity and ..."

(Via Witchvox - RSS Feed - New Articles and Reviews.)

April 09, 2005

The Party of Moderate Progress within the Bounds of the Law goes radical

You gotta love these guys

The Party of Moderate Progress within the Bounds of the Law goes radical: "

United States: Jon Carroll, of the San Francisco Chronicle, has received a mysterious message via an anonymous spam remailer, purporting to be from a shadowy organisation called the Unitarian Jihad. It makes extremely undisturbing reading:

Greetings to the Imprisoned Citizens of the United States! Too long has your attention been waylaid by the bright baubles of extremist thought. Too long have fundamentalist yahoos of all religions (except Buddhism -- 14-5 vote, no abstentions, fundamentalism subcommittee) made your head hurt. Too long have you been buffeted by angry people who think that God talks to them. You have a right to your moderation! You have the power to be calm! We will use the IED of truth to explode the SUV of dogmatic expression!

And how does this Jihad plan to implement its unterrifying aims?

Beware! Unless you people shut up and begin acting like grown-ups with brains enough to understand the difference between political belief and personal faith, the Unitarian Jihad will begin a series of terrorist-like actions. We will take over television studios, kidnap so-called commentators and broadcast calm, well-reasoned discussions of the issues of the day. We will not try for balance by hiring fruitcakes; we will try for balance by hiring non-ideologues who have carefully thought through the issues.

We are Unitarian Jihad. We will appear in public places and require people to shake hands with each other. (Sister Hand Grenade of Love suggested that we institute a terror regime of mandatory hugging, but her motion was not formally introduced because of lack of a quorum.) We will require all lobbyists, spokesmen and campaign managers to dress like trout in public. Televangelists will be forced to take jobs as Xerox repair specialists. Demagogues of all stripes will be required to read Proust out loud in prisons.

Jon Carroll - San Francisco Chronicle, 8th April 2005 (via various LiveJournals).

"

(Via The Pagan Prattle Online.)

April 08, 2005

Christian Law Student Group Sues University

So, why can't they be Christian AND not discriminate? Why is that such a strange policy? What would Jesus have said about this?

Christian Law Student Group Sues University: "A chapter of the national Christian Legal Society at Southern Illinois University's law school filed a lawsuit Tuesday in federal court, alleging school officials violated the group's constitutional rights by revoking its status. The university said the group -- which requires members to pledge to adhere to Christian beliefs, including a prohibition against homosexuality -- had violated school policy that official student organizations must adhere to nondiscrimination laws."

(Via Law.com.)

April 07, 2005

Feds Given Liberal Leave to Attend Pope Services

So what was that strange thing I thought I heard called a First Amendment and this separation thing. I remember how I got laughed at when I wanted Samhain off. Gee.

Feds Given Liberal Leave to Attend Pope Services: "Federal workers who want to observe the Pope's funeral are being given the green light."

(Via WTOP Radio - Local News.)

The Crusaders

You know, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but this really got me going. Thoughts?

The Crusaders: "Meet the Dominionists -- biblical literalists who believe God has called them to take over the U.S. government. As the far-right wing of the evangelical movement, Dominionists are pressing an agenda t"

(Via Witchvox - RSS Feed - News from the Nest.)

April 05, 2005

Wedding celebrations mistaken for alien invasion

Ooops!

Wedding celebrations mistaken for alien invasion: "

England: Police and Stansted Airport received a number of worried calls after a couple launched around 70 Thai lanterns to celebrate their wedding.

But the release of some 60 to 70 illuminated Thai lanterns into the night sky over Leez Priory, near Felsted, sparked fears that aliens were on their way...

...A police spokesman said that one caller reported a large amount of red lights in batches of five or six lights over Bannister Green on the evening of Monday, March 21.

Other callers contacted Stansted Airport concerned that extra-terrestrial activity was about to land.

The situation was eventually resolved when the airport's control tower identified the source of the strange lights.

Wedding lanterns spark UFO scare - Epping Forest Guardian, 3rd April 2005.

"

(Via The Pagan Prattle Online.)

Court upholds California gay partnership law

Court upholds California gay partnership law: "[JURIST] California's Third District Court of Appeal Monday rejected a challenge to the state's domestic partnership law [text] granting same-sex partners a body of rights almost identical to those enjoyed by the state's married couples, including automat"

(Via JURIST.)

April 04, 2005

A College Pagan Society - Cool :-)

It's nice to see that some institutions of higher learning do not discriminate against Paganism. Hooray for Vanderbilt.

The Vanderbilt Pagan Society, which officially began this semester, is providing the opportunity for those who practice Paganism to do so in a group setting and is allowing people who are interested to learn more about Paganism.

Senior Arthur Moore started meeting with three individuals who also were interested in the practice of Paganism his second year at Vanderbilt. The next year, 13 people began meeting, and interest in participating in the group began spreading. Currently, VPS has 30 members, with membership expected to grow.

More here

Women Hit Hard by Bankruptcy Reform

Whether she should have filed for bankruptcy is debatable. But under reform legislation now working its way through Congress, debtors like her may no longer have the option of filing in the first place. By making it tougher and, possibly, more expensive to declare insolvency, the bill aims to encourage personal responsibility and restore more power to creditors in an era when personal bankruptcies have become more popular.

If the reform becomes law, however, women will be the most affected, experts say

More from the Christian Science Monitor

April 01, 2005

Ill. Druggists Must Dispense Birth Control

It's about TIME

Ill. Druggists Must Dispense Birth Control: "Gov. Rod Blagojevich approved an emergency rule Friday requiring pharmacies to fill birth control prescriptions quickly after a Chicago pharmacist refused to fill an order because of moral opposition"

(Via Witchvox - RSS Feed - News from the Nest.)

Silly me... thought it was an april fools joke...

You know.... there's something really nasty about using one's one resources that one pays for, i.e. your Internet connection, to attempt to sell you something without your consent (spam and popups), scam you into something (phishing) or change your religious beliefs without your consent (evangelism). I do hope that none of these well meaning people annoys you (or me) this April 24th Internet Evangelism Day Scheduled For April 24 By Jeremy Reynalds (03/31/05) The President of the National Association of Evangelicals in the United States has given his endorsement to Internet Evangelism Day. In a news release from the Internet Evangelism Coalition (IEC), Rev. Ted Haggard said incredible technological breakthroughs mean that "evangelical Christians must take advantage of this information superhighway. Internet Evangelism Day will help focus our efforts on effectively using this tool. " Haggard also encouraged "all evangelical leaders to take advantage of this initiative and explore their options for using the web to win as many as possible to Christ." Internet Evangelism Day (IED), scheduled for April 24, is designed to help churches, ministries and individuals discover the potential of the Internet for sharing the Gospel More, if you can stand it

No Comment

DENVER, Co. -- Apple Computer is facing criticism over its Macintosh computers from an unusual source: religious conservatives.

They're upset about products from the Cupertino, Calif.-based computer maker being associated with a logo of a two-horned red devil.

"That suggests Satan to me, and I don't think I'm alone," James Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family, said during an interview on Fox News Channel on Thursday evening. "Apple needs to realize this is offensive to God-fearing Christians or face a boycott."

Apple's OS X computers are based on software called "FreeBSD," which has chosen a pitchfork-wielding devil as its logo and mascot. FreeBSD is published by the FreeBSD Foundation in Boulder.

Dobson said he and other religious leaders had become aware of the devil imagery as a result of Apple's expected release of its new Tiger version. "No respectable American company should want to ally itself with the Lord of Darkness or make light of him," he said.

Another reason why Christians may want to choose Microsoft products is that Apple computers are based on the "Darwin" code, Dobson warned. "If you ask me, Steve Jobs should rename it 'Paley' to avoid further confrontation with our community," he said.

William Paley is the early-19th century English theologian who advanced the theory of intelligent design, basically that some facets of nature were so complex that they could have been created only by God. Charles Darwin is known for his theory of evolution.

Apple released a statement late Thursday that said: "Jokes about daemons and wizards and the Berkeley Unix mascot have a long history in the computer world. We mean no disrespect toward Christians and will work with the FreeBSD Foundation toward finding a more appropriate symbol for our products. We thank the Rev. Dobson for bringing this to our attention."

The FreeBSD Foundation did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Discovery Institute, a Seattle-based think tank that opposes the teaching of evolution, wrote a letter to Apple last week raising questions about the use of the name "Darwin" in the OS X code. The think tank is sponsoring a lecture in Seattle next week titled: "From Darwin To Hitler: Does Darwinism Devalue Human Life?"